Order Chinkee Tan's and Lanilane's package books

Wednesday, March 2, 2022

CAN A WOMAN LEAD IN THE CHURCH?

 

[position paper in Reformed Theology, ThM, WTCS-Cambodia]

Introduction

The issue of having women in the ministry has always been a primary concern in many churches today. There are many evangelical churches that allow having Lady Pastors, Elders, or Deacons while others strictly do not ordain any woman leader at all. Among the strongest Biblical sources being held on to regarding this ecclesiastical doctrine are the accounts of the Apostle Paul when he wrote his epistles to the churches of Corinth and Ephesus. Apparently, Pauline theology has always been part of the discussions with regards to deciding if women will be allowed to lead in the Church.

 

Paul About Women In the Ministry

"As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says." 1 Corinthians 14:34-35

Pauline theology has been controversial when it comes to treating women who are in the ministry. One of the phrases in Pauline epistles that is often confused about is in 1 Corinthians 14, where he said that "women should keep quiet". If thoroughly exegeted, one will realize that Paul was just addressing an issue within the Corinth church that time and he was not making a universal rule for the Church. This chapter, particularly verses 34 and 35 are usually interpreted out of context by some churches. [1]

Remember that the phrase "no longer male and female" that he said Galatians 3:28 will show Paul's view of equality between men and women, though he was about having each, man and woman, different and special ministries, as what he talked about godly characteristics of a church leader who is a husband of one wife and so forth), and then husband should be the head of the family and the wife should submit to him. This is not about superiority and inferiority. These are equal ministries- husband as head and wife in full submission and children under them. Hence, Paul was not against having women leading in the ministry.

To understand better if Paul was in favor or against having women in the ministry are these women whom he himself has discipled to lead in churches that he planted over the years of ministry in Europe.

“I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a deacon of the church in Cenchreae. I ask you to receive her in the Lord in a way worthy of his people and to give her any help she may need from you, for she has been the benefactor of many people, including me…Greet Priscilla[2] and Aquila, my co-workers in Christ Jesus. They risked their lives for me. Not only I but all the churches of the Gentiles are grateful to them . . . Greet Andronicus and Junia, my fellow Jews who have been in prison with me. They are outstanding among the apostles, and they were in Christ before I was . . . Greet Tryphena and Tryphosa, those women who work hard in the Lord. Greet my dear friend Persis, another woman who has worked very hard in the Lord. [3]  Rom. 16:1-12

We cannot give an accurate number of women in the ministry from Paul's planted Churches but aside from those mentioned above, there are also Prisca, Nympha, Mary, Lydia who were heads of house churches. If Paul has charged these women in the name of Jesus to be leading in the ministry, then we can say that there is no problem having women as a pastor, deacon, or an elder in the church then and now. It has always something to do about the needs of the church and of course, the leading of the Holy Spirit in the congregation.

 

Problem in the Ephesus

1 Timothy 2:11-12 was intended to instruct the church in Ephesus regarding how women (and even men) should behave in the church, based on the bigger scope- whole chapter 2- being the "Instructions on Worship". [4]

The first pastoral letter to Timothy by Paul was written around AD 65, after Paul's 1st imprisonment. During those days, one of the problems in the church was the different (or perhaps disrespectful) behavior of women in the church. It was supposedly because of the rising ego of women caused by the prevalent idolatry towards a Goddess named Artemis (Diana-Roman equivalent) as mentioned in Acts 19. Hence, the strong personalities of some women then have been making trouble in the church, making worship services unpeaceful and disappointing to others. Some women talk to their husbands during worship like asking things, interrupting them in every way and whenever they feel like doing it. They seem to, in some point, dominate their husbands.

This problem, as Paul viewed it, had to be solved by instructing women to keep silent or learn in silence, and submit to their husbands. Paul said he does not permit the woman to talk in the church but this does not mean that women are not permitted to preach nor lead in the church. He was addressing an issue about a particular woman in the church who has been a problem to the congregation but he did not name her in the letter.[5] This is not the first time that Paul did it as he also wrote epistles to other churches addressing issues with individuals without mentioning their names.[6]

As per Paul, there is always the right time to talk. Hence, women should stop talking during worship, as their voices cause disturbance in the church. It has been said that in the early churches, women and men usually have separate designated places to sit on. Therefore, when a woman wants to ask something to his husband, she tends to shout towards her husband the question, which awkwardly puts up an annoying scenario inside the church during worship.

Obviously, the plight was over then, hence the solution given by Paul was for that time as well, and not for us today. Again, it is a matter of context.

 

Jesus' View According to the Scriptures

Jesus himself was not against women being leaders in the Church. Remember there were five people under His feet when He was on the cross, and four out of those five were women. The first disciples whom Jesus appeared to when He resurrected were also women (Magdalene and Mary). And the first evangelist that He had was the Samaritan woman by the well. And this may sound out of context but the only 'DNA' Jesus had was of a woman, which was of Mary’s.

Jesus surely does not want women today to be in silence or remain to be mere attendees and constant listeners. As He wants the church to be organic, women in the ministry are also expected to grow and become instruments for the advancement of the Kingdom.  Jesus has given the commission to everyone not just to men.

The Lord acknowledged women in the ministry many times as we look at the accounts in the New Testament or even in the Old Testament like Deborah, the only woman judge then, and Esther, the queen who represented the Jewish people during the Assyrian rule.

 

God did not say "I will use men only in my kingdom", but clearly, He wants everyone, men and women, to work with Him as He does His will on earth. 1 Peter 4:10 says that "Each one should use whatever gift he has received to serve others, faithfully administering God's grace in its various forms.".. and all, men and women, are parts of the body of Christ, as said in 1 Corinthians 12. Either men or women, can speak and teach in the church, as long as it's according to God's call and purpose.

 

Conclusion

            Realizing from this position paper, I am looking closely to my own church as well. Being an independent church, we are still small in number and there are not a lot of men in the church. In our context, women usually lead Bible studies and outreaches. Even the educators are mostly women not to mention majority of the elders/council are women as well. If we will wait for men to come to church and become leaders, it will take months or years for them to commit. But the needs are so great so churches like us do not have a choice but to tap the only resources that we have, and these are the women who have been discipled and are committed to serve the church and the Lord.

            Personally, I do not see any problem having women leading in the church but I respect ministers and churches who strictly have men alone lead the church. For as long as we all serve the Lord with all our heart, mind, body and soul, and we commit our whole selves to the great commission to reach our Jerusalem, Judah, Samaria, and the ends of the earth, then I believe the Lord recognizes that in spite of the flaws that we have in the organic church, that is still in the process of perfection.

 

Other online sources read for this position paper:

https://www.americamagazine.org/issue/675/article/women-and-paul

https://www.bible-bridge.com/pauls-view-of-women/

https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-29513427

https://directionjournal.org/9/1/role-of-women-in-church-pauline.html

 



[1] Loren Cunningham, et.al., Why Not Women? Seattle, WA, 2000. P185-185. “Keep in mind that this verse is part of a passage that concludes a seven-part series on ministry in the church, as outlined at the beginning of chapter 12. Paul didn’t toss out haphazard ideas. He was a controlled, disciplined writer and nowhere more so than in this intricate passage. Any understanding of this verse regarding women keeping silent has to be viewed in the context of what has gone before. This includes 1 Corinthians 11:2-16, which as we’ve seen before strongly affirms men and women praying and prophesying in public gatherings of the church.”

[2] Ibid. Paul was preaching about silencing women in the church, where Priscila was a founding leader, where she spent years of leading along with her husband Aquila. The same church where Apollos was corrected for his errors in leadership. “Was Paul, who had asked the church in Rome to receive the woman minister Phoebe with all due honor, now contradicting himself telling Timothy never to allow women to be leaders in the church? P.207

 

[4] Ibid. “…Paul used a mini-chiasm (in this passage in 1 Timothy).. He began talking about women in general, then switched to a particular woman, then switched back to women in general,” p.207

[5] Ibid. p.213. “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man;she must be silent..”

[6] (1) A man in Corinth committing incest. 1 Cor.5:1 (2) Titus being instructed by Paul to warn a divisive person once, and then for the second warning without positive response, he should let the person be as he has nothing to do with him anymore. Titus 3:10-11.

HAS THE GIFT OF PROPHECY CEASED?

 

[my position paper in Reformed Theology, ThM, WTCS-Cambodia]

Introduction

The Missio Dei is apparently also the mission of the Church in the New Testament as the result of Christ’s incarnational ministry. The outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the Pentecost was the seal of the official “sending” of the church not just for the Jews but to the Gentiles as well. The gifts of the Holy Spirit were upon every believer: apostles, prophets, teachers, healers, and pastors. The power of God was just so strong and obvious then. The question now is, are these gifts and power still strong today? Have these continued or ceased? Apostleship (church planters) still exist as well as teachers. Pastors are around the world and Healing and other miracles are still happening. But prophets, are they still needed here? Some names today like Jeremiah Johnson or Sadhu and so forth, are they true prophets?

 

Gift of Prophecy: Continued or Ceased?

Cessasionists like Richard Gaffin[1] and Daniel Wallace believe that the sign gifts of the Holy Spirit have expired and are not expected to appear today. Two of the known reformists Martin Luther and John Calvin also supported this position along with others like the 20th century John Gresham Machen and B.B. Warfield. The Sola Scriptura, originated from Luther, was among the strong standpoints of this group. For them, the charismatic groups technically violate this whenever the claim for the Holy Spirit gifts' existence is proclaimed and practiced. Nonetheless, the Bible tells nothing about the gifts being stopped or expired although nothing was mentioned about these being continued either. Some Cessasionists like John McArthur balance it out by agreeing with the Continuationist’s interpretation that “prophecy” and revelatory gifts exist in natural terms.[2] Modern theologians like Sam Storms, in the Strange Fire Conference, say that it is important to consider “the explicit and oft-repeated purpose of the charismata: namely, the edification of Christ's body”.[3] For Storms, this is not possible if the gifts of the Holy Spirit were just made available to the New Testament apostles only. Thomas Schreiner responded to this by emphasizing that only the apostolic church had the gifts and all we have now are their teachings until Jesus returns.[4]

I personally do not believe that the gift of prophecy or any of the apostolic gifts have ceased but I say this with particular reservations. We cannot deny the fact though that the Holy Spirit’s operation changed from the Old Testament to the New Testament. Today’s operation of the Holy Spirit is also different from those two periods. When the Old Testament prophets say “Thus says the Lord…”, it should be infallible. When the New Testament prophets say the same, Paul warned that the church should judge the prophecy.[5] At this point, the New Testament prophets never erred except those false prophets whose prophecies did not come into effect. Today’s prophets, on the other hand, are said to function differently. Schreiner said that what we have today are prophecies that are actually the impressions from God.[6] These impressions are used by God to lead us.[7] These are infallible and should be judged according to the Scriptures. I would agree with Schreiner that we receive impressions from God but we should be careful about how we view these impressions. The Holy Spirit is indwelling us so the prophetic impressions would be possible for every believer. Even so, we cannot walk blinded of the experiences and evidences that God still speaks to prophets today for the purpose of warning and rebuking of hearts. This may be the least reason to establish for the standpoint of supporting the prophecies we receive today but we cannot question God when the Holy Spirit Himself inspires a servant to go to a place or proclaim an impending event for a nation, a church, or an individual. Christians have to be wise and be led by the Spirit. They have the Old Testament and New Testament truth and testimonies. More knowledge and responsibilities are given today. It is therefore important that Christians should judge according to what God has provided in history.

 

How the HS operates Today Through the “Modern Prophets

“The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God’s children.” Romans 8:16, NIV

God came down from heaven to earth and torn the veil so that we can have direct communication and relationship with Him. Therefore, it can be said that all Christians can actually prophesy.[8] The Holy Spirit is already in every believer and on and on, the impressions are received by a servant and child of God. These impressions[9] refer to the voice of the God speaking to a Christian through the Holy Spirit. Nonetheless, this standpoint can be really dangerous to some as God said through the prophet Ezekiel that the false prophets who prophesy from their own inspiration will be rebuked and punished.[10]

Technically, the viewpoint that all Christians can prophesy can be rejected as based on Luther’s Sola Scriptura. Nothing in the Bible that says all believers can prophesy. Some though will receive the gift of prophecy while others’ gifts will be in line with apostleship, teaching, healing, miracles, and pastoring. We cannot limit the Holy Spirit but the gift of prophecy is such a heavy and critical task or office to take.

The Holy Spirit directs the prophecies for the waking up of people for the ultimate purpose of deliverance. He uses the prophet to carry the Word. From the very mouth of God, the prophet receives the Word and begins to be the mouthpiece of the most High God. The phrase “Thus says the Lord” is among the heaviest and most important phrases in the Bible. When this is said, the power of God is upon it. A false prophet who says this phrase has an immeasurable responsibility to God because of using His name. Uttering this phrase without the truth that God really spoke to him will mean blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. Hence, since that what we have today are just impressions from the Lord, we cannot say the phrases: “God revealed to me” or “Thus says the Lord..” so to speak. It may be more appropriate to say “The Lord impressed to me that..” and so on and so forth.

Jesus As a Prophet Has to Be Imitated

Jesus spoke and taught in parables, which are in line with the Old Testament and more importantly with the Old Testament prophets.[11] Though it may sound artistic, the parables of Jesus were not primarily intended to draw people closer. “The parables are not nice stories, mere clever illustrations, or nice pedagogical tools: they are part of a prophetic agenda.”[12] Jesus used parables to bring the message of the Father and to confront the hearts of people. It was still His agenda to reconcile and reconstitute Israel (and later the other nations) under His leadership. He was prophet, teacher, discipler, and everything to fulfill His purpose for humankind. And we are to imitate His example during His three-year ministry, including such prophetic ministry.

Functions of the New Testament Prophets Were Limited Though

            Some theologians say that the prophets and teachers in 1 Corinthians 12:28 were the same.[13] Nonetheless, προφήτης and διδάσκαλος are different. The reason why the former was second and the latter was third in the list is that, Paul was talking about two different offices. Even so, there is a relation between these two as Jesus did both. His forerunner, John the Baptist, also did. They both gave predictive prophecies and taught people about the prophecies. Judas and Silas in Acts 15 also were prophets and at the same time teachers in the church. Not all did the same though. Some of the prophets mentioned above were plainly prophets, who predicted future events. An example was Agabus who predicted the famine and Paul’s arrest by the Jews and handing over to the Romans. Some apostles (apostolos) were also prophets at the same time like John the beloved. In spite of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the Pentecost, there were limitations in the functions of the prophets in the New Testament as the early church developed.[14] Why did the prophetic ministry changed and narrowed down the functions? Harold said:

First, it is to be observed that in essence Christ's apostles, as in the case of the savior himself, are prophets as far as functions are concerned: they are God's spokesman guided by the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 7:40); predictors of the future (1 and 2 Thessalonians; 2 Peter 3, Revelation); teachers (1 Timothy 2:7); and workers of miracles (Matthew 10:8; Acts 3:1-8; 13:8-11; 20:9-10). Secondly, as the New Testament Church develops under the leadership of the apostles, the concentration of these gifts which they themselves possessed and continued to exercise are seen, at least in part, to be shared among the members of the church for its better functioning…[15]

 

Note that in the Old Testament, God spoke to the prophets to send the message to the people. In the New Testament, Jesus Christ came so that by the power of the Holy Spirit, the church will speak to all the nations. It is therefore not usual to have direct revelation from God from the Apostolic Church period on, because of the incarnational ministry of Jesus. Otherwise, when the need arose, God handpicked prophets in the New Testament like Agabus, Anna, and others to speak of predictive prophecies.

Conclusion

            The gift of prophecy has not ceased but this office functions in a different way. It is distinct from the office of the prophets in the Old Testament and the New Testament. What the believers have today are impressions from the Lord. There is no direct WORD from the Lord to man except from what He has already written in the Scriptures. The Scripture itself is the Lord’s prophecy for the believers. Hence today, no believer can say “Thus says the Lord” to certain group of people. It is more appropriate to say “the Scripture says..”. Nonetheless, we cannot limit the Holy Spirit. He can show Himself to people if He wants to, just like how some believers say in their testimonies. But again, saying that the Lord Himself appeared to them and directly utter the words so they can tell the people, this takes a lot of accountabilities before the Lord.

 

 

 



[1] Richard B. Gaffin have agreed with some Continuationist interpretation of the gifts today but he did not consider the idea about the natural character of these gifts. See more about this in Gaffin’s Perspectives on Pentecost (NJ: Presbyterian and Rformed Company, 1979), 109.

[2] John F. MacArthur, Charismatic Chaos (MI: Zondervan, 1992), 389. http://books.google.com.ph/books?id=TnVj53uZVjkC&printsec=frontcover&hl=fil#v=onepage&q&f=false (viewed August 25, 2014)

[5] 1 Corinthians 14:29-31, “Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said. 30 If a revelation is made to another sitting there, let the first be silent. 31 For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all be encouraged, 32 and the spirits of prophets are subject.”

[7] Wayne Grudem sees these impressions as prophecy. See also Grudem’s Stanley Gundry’s compilation of views in “Are Miraculous Gifts For Today”? (MI: Zondervan, 2011).

[8] Some writers like Steve Thompson and Robert Benjamin Hall produced books about these. See Thompson Steve's "You may all prophesy!" Morning star publications (2000) and Rober B. Hall's Anyone can Prophesy (NY:Seabury Press, 1977).

[9] “Impressions” term used by Schreiner above and referred to as prophecy itself by W. Grudem.

[10] NIV, Ezekiel 13:1-4, “The word of the Lord came to me: 2“Son of man, prophesy against the prophets of Israel who are now prophesying. Say to those who prophesy out of their own imagination: ‘Hear the word of the Lord! This is what the Sovereign Lord says: Woe to the foolish[a] prophets who follow their own spirit and have seen nothing! Your prophets, Israel, are like jackals among ruins.”

 

[11] Klyne Snodgrass, “Parables, Prophets and Theologians” Bulletin for Biblical Research 18.1 (2008), 45–77.

[12] Snodgrass, 54.

[13] C. Rabin, The Zadokite Documents (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954), 28.

[14] Mare Harold says thatThe prophet function, as the Church developed, seems to be limited to that of inspired utterances of some sort given under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit ( I Cor. 14:29-32 ).” See his, “Prophet and teacher in the New Testament periodBulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 9 no 3 (Sum 1966), 139-148. Prophets actually function also as teachers and/or apostles at the same time. It really depends on the need and the direction of the Holy Spirit for the minister.

[15] M.Harold, 147-148.